Book Details:
• Author: Jason C. Meyer
• Category: Theology
• Publisher: Broadman & Holman Academic (2009)
• Format: Hardcover
• Page Count: 352
• ISBN#: 9780805448429
• List Price: $19.99
• Rating: Highly Recommended
Review:
The nature of how the Mosaic Law relates to the Gospel and the new covenant is a perennially problematic question. Luther and Calvin wrestled over this, and we continue to wrestle over this down to today. Jason C. Meyer picks up his pen to try and tackle this problem in his book The End of the Law: Mosaic Covenant in Pauline Theology, as part of the New American Commentary Studies in Bible and Theology from Broadman and Holman.
With such an enormous topic, it is doubtful that Meyer will please everyone. And while I found much that was excellent in his book, there were moments where I thought he didn’t handle something well enough and times where I wished he would have dealt with a topic that he passed over. But I can’t fault Meyer for not tackling head-on, an important question. He does an able job dealing with this question and his book was truly a joy to read.
Meyer’s book presents the problem of how the Mosaic covenant is handled in Paul and then focuses on the old/new antithesis in Paul as the solution to this problem. He studies Paul’s epistles to see how Paul himself presents the old vs. the new, and particularly how he talks of the covenant. From this a few key passages are identified and discussed in detail: 2 Corinthians 3-4, Galatians 3-4, and Romans 9-11. Then after dealing with Paul’s theology of the old and new, Meyer goes to the Old Testament himself to see if he can harmonize Paul with the Old Testament’s own description of the Mosaic covenant, in its own terms.
Meyer’s conclusions are that Paul sees a difference between the Old covenant and New Covenant in eschatological terms. The old was ineffectual and is proven so by the presence of the new covenant in the here and now. With the dawn of the new age, the old covenant is seen for how ineffectual it was. The new covenant has the power to create lasting change through the presence of the Spirit in far greater measure than in the old.
Along the way, Meyer offers a masterful analysis of the texts he covers and models a careful, yet thoroughly evangelical approach to Scripture, which focuses on the authorial intent and canonical form of the text. My primary issue with his exegesis is in his making too much of Romans 11 and failing to deal adequately with the fact that in the new covenant we still have those who are visible members but not actual partakers of the covenant. I also wish he would deal more explicitly with the question of Israel and the Church: does the old/new antithesis in Paul imply that the church should be seen as the new and fuller expression of believing Israel? I suspect Meyer would say yes, but he doesn’t come right out and address this.
The book makes for a fascinating read, and will be appreciated by lay students as well as pastors and scholars. Knowledge of exegesis and theology will help in being able to appreciate the book more, however. Meyer writes with clarity and has a knack for boiling down complex issues and explaining what other more technical writers are saying. He interacts with the voluminous literature on the topic well, and maintains a thoroughly evangelical approach throughout. This is a refreshing read and I highly recommend it.
Author Info:
Jason C. Meyer is associate professor of New Testament at Bethlehem College and Seminary in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Previously he was assistant professor of religion (New Testament and Greek) at Louisiana College in Pineville, Louisiana. He holds degrees from Oklahoma Wesleyan University (B.S.) and The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary (M. Div., Ph. D.).
Where to Buy:
• Westminster Bookstore: book
• CBD: book ~ ebook
• Amazon: book ~ ebook
• Barnes & Noble: book ~ ebook
• Broadman & Holman: book
Related Media:
• Book Preview
• PDF copy of this review 
Disclaimer:
This book was provided by Broadman and Holman Publishing Group for review. I was under no obligation to offer a favorable review.
Bob, you finally hit on something that I have been trying to put together in my mind when it comes to the discussion of who receives the promises given to Israel. You said: “My primary issue with his exegesis is in his making too much of Romans 11 and failing to deal adequately with the fact that in the new covenant we still have those who are visible members but not actual partakers of the covenant.” This is dead on! The church, like Israel, is given promises and blessings which God will fulfill. Local assemblies (churches), like Israel, have both true believing and professing believers (partakers) as well as those who think they are but arent (simply members). The church receives God’s promises made to it. Some now and others later (at the time of and after Christ’s return). Those that are received now are received in a general sense by the whole professing church (members). However, only those who are truly saved can be said to truly receive the promises and blessings (partakers).
Is this making sense? Would this fall in line with what you are saying? Or am I out in la la land?
For me a light just went on.
That’s my understanding, yes. Now one might be able to argue that the percentages of the true possessors, vs. the false professors is greater in the new covenant era, but you can’t say it is 100%. And this to me, is where some of the arguments based on the new covenant fail to deliver for believer’s baptism. There is discontinuity but also a great deal of continuity. That being said, I still think what is said of baptism in the new testament is big enough that it should be reserved for professing believer’s only.
I agree with you on the baptism thing as being an area of discontinuity. Have you read this yet? https://www.wtsbooks.com/product-exec/product_id/23/nm/Case+for+Covenantal+Infant+Baptism
I hope to read it soon.
No I haven’t. I need to finish Believer’s Baptism, edited by Thomas R. Schreiner and Shawn Wright (Broadman & Holman), first. I was really impressed by Ardel Caneday’s chapter in that book. That is another New American Commentary Studies in Bible and Theology title, by the way.
Yes I need to get that as well.
This looks like it would be good as well for covenants and baptism discussion – https://www.wtsbooks.com/product-exec/product_id/7975/nm/Covenant+Theology%3A+A+Reformed+and+Baptistic+Perspective+on+God%27s+Covenants+%28Hardcover%29
Hi. I just had a question. I was wondering if you could recommend a book that discusses ‘faith’ in the old testament vs ‘faith’ in the new testament. When I read the Scriptures, I see that the Godly people that lived in the time before the Incarnation, were saved through faith in the coming messiah . And the men after the Incarnation are saved through faith in the messiah that came. So how does this apply to covenant of works? i know that no person was ever saved through works of the law.