What is the Gospel?

What would you say is the essence of the gospel?

Today many answers might be given. “The gospel is the good news that God loves you.” “Forgiveness of sins based on faith in Jesus’ atoning death on the cross is the main point of the gospel.” “Jesus died and rose again so that we might have eternal life–This is the gospel!” “The gospel is the news that God loved each of us so much He did everything He could so that we could spend eternity with Him!”

To a greater or lesser degree we all might be tempted to agree with each of the statements above. Yet this might lead us to think of the greatness of the gospel from a dangerously human-centered viewpoint. WE are SO SPECIAL that God did EVERYTHING He could so that WE could escape Hell and BE HAPPY for ever in heaven. Is the gospel God’s way of showing the great value of man? Or is the gospel the means for our self-centered enjoyments and pleasures to continue on without the bother of sin and pain? Or is the gospel really much, much MORE than that?

The Bible speaks of the gospel as being the “gospel of the grace of God” (Acts 20:24). 2 Cor. 4:3-6 highlights the gracious nature of the gospel in a breathtakingly beautiful way:

And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled only to those who are perishing. In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. For what we proclaim is not ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, with ourselves as your servants for Jesus’ sake. For God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

These verses declare that God sovereignly, in an act comparable to His work on the first day of creation, sheds the light of His gospel into our hearts, overcoming Satan’s work of actively blinding sinner’s eyes to the glorious worth of Christ (cf. 2 Tim. 2:24-26). More teaching concerning the nature of the gospel comes from a recognition of the parallel phrases in vs. 4 and 6. “The light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God” is compared to “the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ”. Without a communication of knowledge, there is no reception of the gospel. Further, the gospel centers on the glorious worth of God. This glory belongs to the Triune God and is revealed by seeing the face of Christ–the very image of God.

This book is a cry from the heart of John Piper. He is pleading that God himself, as revealed in Christ's death and resurrection, is the ultimate and greatest gift of the gospel. (Taken from the back cover.) Click to order the book.John Piper takes on this theme in his latest book God Is the Gospel: Meditations on God’s Love as the Gift of Himself. He argues that the gospel is all about God giving Himself to us for our good and His glory. The gospel trumpets God’s worth not man’s.

Piper says, “The best and final gift of the gospel is that we gain Christ….In place of this, we have turned the love of God and the gospel of Christ into a divine endorsement of our delight in many lesser things, especially the delight in our being made much of. The acid test of biblical God-centeredness–and faithfulness to the gospel–is this: Do you feel more loved because God makes much of you, or because, at the cost of his Son, he enables you to enjoy making much of him forever?” (pg. 11)

He goes on to contend that God’s saving love “is God’s commitment to do everything necessary to enthrall us with what is most deeply and durably satisfying, namely himself.” (pg. 13) Piper explains further what he means: “None of Christ’s gospel deeds and none of our gospel blessings are good news except as means of seeing and savoring the glory of Christ. Forgiveness is good news because it opens the way to enjoyment of God himself. Justification is good news because it wins access to the presence and pleasures of God himself. Eternal life is good news because it becomes the everlasting enjoyment of Christ.” (from the back cover)

So when we think of the gospel are we thinking of the gift being God Himself?

Piper asks, “If you could have heaven, with no sickness, and with all the friends you ever had on earth, and all the food you ever liked, and all the leisure activities you ever enjoyed, and all the natural beauties you ever saw, all the physical pleasures you ever tasted, and no human conflict or any natural disasters, could you be satisfied with heaven, if Christ was not there?” (pg. 15) He then challenges Christian leaders to “preach and teach and lead in such a way that people are prepared to hear that question and answer with a resounding NO“. (pg. 15)

He goes on to wonder “Have we presented the gospel in such a way that the gift of the glory of God in the face of Christ is marginal rather than central and ultimate?” (pg. 15)

All of the thoughts presented here, basically come from Piper’s intoduction. As I read through this book, I plan to periodically post more excerpts and thoughts on this all-important topic. (I will link all subsequent posts to this first post, by the way.) I encourage you all to get and read this book (you can order it by clicking here). And may we come to love and prize Christ more so that we might answer Piper’s question with that resounding NO! I leave you with the concluding paragraphs of Piper’s introduction, and a brief prayer of my own.

When we celebrate the gospel of Christ and the love of God, and when we lift up the gift of salvation, let us do it in such a way that people will see through it to God himself. May those who hear the gospel from our lips know that salvation is the blood-bought gift of seeing and savoring the glory of Christ. May they believe and say, “Christ is all!” Or, to use the words of the psalmist, “May those who love your salvation say evermore, ‘God is great!” (Ps. 70:4). Not mainly, “Salvation is great,” but “God is great!”May the church of Jesus Christ say with increasing intensity, “The LORD is my chosen portion and my cup” (Ps. 16:5). “As a deer pants for flowing streams, so pants my soul for you, O God. My soul thirsts for God, for the living God” (Ps. 42:1). “We would rather be away from the body and at home with the Lord” (2 Cor. 5:8). “My desire is to depart and be with Christ, for that is far better” (Phil. 1:23).

The world needs nothing more than to see the worth of Christ in the work and words of his God-besotted people. This will come to pass when the church awakens to the truth that the saving love of God is the gift of himself, and that God himself is the gospel. (pg. 16-17)

Lord! Open my eyes, open our eyes to the glories of Christ. May we declare “God is great!” rather than merely saying “Salvation is great!” Lord may You do a glorious work within us that our lives would reflect Your worth. May we prize You above life and above Your blessings. May we risk all to advance the cause of Your great Name! May we declare Your Glory to all our friends and acquaintances. May we spur one another on to love and good works in our fight of faith looking unto our glorious Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Fill our eyes and minds with Your Glory as manifested in Jesus. Do this because of Your great love and Jesus’ atoning work on our behalf. We pray in Your name, Amen.


∼striving for the unity of the faith for the glory of God∼ Eph. 4:3,13 “¢ Rom. 15:5-7

Once Saved, Always Saved?!?!

Eternal Security, the get-out-of-jail-free card evangelicals carry enabling them to party and live it up with the 100% assurance that they will not face the wrath of God!NOTE: For an updated copy of this post, see the “Mining the Archives” post here.

Today’s popular evangelical maxim “once saved, always saved” while based in the Biblical truth of justification by faith alone has morphed into a virtual get-out-of-jail-free card for far too many. The church’s duty to make disciples of all nations has been downgraded to an optional extra. The gospel call to repent and believe has become a plea for sinners to assent to the facts of the gospel, pray a prayer, and join the cool Christian club called churchianity. Gone are the stern warnings to “watch and pray” and “endure to the end”. Gone are the bold exhortations to “make your calling and election sure” and “be diligent to be found in [Christ] without spot or blemish”. In their place are the warm assurances “since you confessed you are saved” and “since eternal life is a free gift, God cannot take it back”, and the friendly reminders “everybody makes mistakes” and “don’t sweat: remember, we’re under grace!” The old doctrine that saints must diligently make a personal effort to persevere in faith has been overshadowed by the new doctrine that saints can live just like anyone else in the world and as long as they once assented to gospel truths they are most certainly bound for heaven.

I wish I was merely exaggerating the situation. But when a nationally well known evangelical leader like Charles Stanley seriously believes and teaches that people who actually stop believing in Christ and walk out on God are still eternally secure, I can hardly be accused of overstating my case. In the article linked to above he claims, “The Bible clearly teaches that God’s love for His people is of such magnitude that even those who walk away from the faith have not the slightest chance of slipping from His hand.” He goes on to only deal with Eph. 2:4-9 and 1 Cor. 1:21, while adding in a good portion of reasoning and illustrations. In his book Eternal Security: Can You Be Sure? he makes the startling claim that salvation can be compared to receiving a tattoo. Even if moments later, you regret receiving the tattoo, it cannot change the fact that you have it! (pg. 80)

The Grace Evangelical Society exists to perpetuate such ideas. In other specters of evangelicalism, easy believism is represented by a 1-2-3-repeat-after-me approach to evangelism. A very large segment of independent fundamental Baptists (represented by literally thousands of churches and tens [if not hundreds] of thousands of members) emphasizes this approach to such excess that staggeringly huge numbers of salvations and baptisms are reported each year–which if really true, would make the Great Awakening look like a picnic. People are converted in five minutes or less–even through a rolled-down window during the duration of a stop light! One church has boasted of a milliion souls saved in the past 25 years, and yet less than 500 attend on any given Sunday.

Today no view seems criticized as much as Lordship Salvation or the Calvinistic doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints. These views are very similar, if not synonomous and both share a strong critique. Charges of “works-salvation” or “perfectionism” are thrown mercilessly at these misunderstood views.

So how did we come to such a time and situation as this? It seems that in a mix of zeal and evangelistic fervor, popular Christianity began to move away from its confessional roots in the late 1800s. American individualism probably worsened the situation, as Sola Scriptura became the license for anyone and everyone to disregard centuries of theological formulations and church teaching and come up with a myriad of homespun theories. The lasting impact of Charles G. Finney, who rejected substitutionary atonement among other orthodox doctrines, also contributed to what became popular American revivalism. Today, people have hardly heard of many of the great Reformation confessions like the Westminster Confession or the Synod of Dort, and yet they are quick to find a proof text for a host of contradictory Biblical teachings.

Yet a misunderstanding of perseverance is not limited to Arminians and non-Calvinists today, either. Doug Wilson says it well in a recent post on Heb. 3:7-19:

Apostasy is a real sin, committed by real people. This is something that Arminians get, and that most Calvinists do not get. None of the elect can every [sic] be taken out of God’s electing and sovereign decree. This is something that Calvinists get, and that Arminians do not get. Arminians can read Romans 8 through 11 and not see the absolute sovereignty of God, which is something that never ceases to astonish me. But lest we Calvinists get on a high horse, Arminians can read though Hebrews and can see real apostasy there. There are few things more exegetically embarrassing than to hear a Calvinist talk about how the warnings are hypothetical, like “keep off the grass” signs in the middle of the Sahara. There are many things that can be said to this, but the most compelling of them is that the warnings invariably deny that they are anything like hypothetical….The sin warned against here is that of evil unbelief, pure and simple. Not only is it unbelief, it is unbelief resulting in apostasy — departure from the living God, falling away from the living God. The sin is spoken of in the sternest possible way — rebellion, hardened hearts, evil heart of unbelief, and a departure from God…..This book [Hebrews] is about the sin of apostasy. Can a Christian fall away? Yes. Can someone who is truly regenerate, elect of God, an eternal Christian, fall away? No, clearly not.

Before I go on to defend the Biblical (I believe) doctrine of perseverance, let me provide here a brief excerpt from John Piper’s book The Purifying Power of Living by Faith in Future Grace


A few years ago I spoke to a high school student body on how to fight lust. One of my points was called, “Ponder the eternal danger of lust.” I quoted the words of Jesus–that it’s better to go to heaven with one eye than to hell with two–and said to the students that their eternal destiny was at stake in what they did with their eyes and with the thoughts of their imagination….After my message…one of the students…asked, “Are you saying then that a person can lose his salvation?”…This is exactly the same response I got a few years ago when I confronted a man about the adultery he was living in….I pled with him to return to his wife. Then I said, “You know, Jesus says that if you don’t fight this sin with the kind of seriousness that is willing to gouge out your own eye, you will go to hell”….As a professing Christian he looked at me in utter disbelief, as though he had never heard anything like this in his life, and said, “You mean you think a person can lose his salvation?”…So I have learned again and again from firsthand experience that there are many professing Christians who have a view of salvation that disconnects it from real life, and that nullifies the threats of the Bible, and puts the sinning person who claims to be a Christian beyond the reach of biblical warnings. I believe this view of the Christian life is comforting thousands who are on the broad way that leads to destruction (Matthew 7:13)….The main concern of this book is to show that the battle against sin is a battle against unbelief. Or: the fight for purity is a fight for faith in future grace. The great error that I am trying to explode is the error that says, “Faith in God is one thing and the fight for holiness is another thing….The battle for obedience is optional because only faith is necessary for final salvation.” (pg. 330-331 and 333)

Belief in perseverance does not negate the great truth that faith alone justifies and secures our eternal salvation. Rather it affirms with Martin Luther, “We are saved by faith alone, but not a faith that is alone.” Our works prove the sincerity of our faith, and are in this sense necessary. This is why so many passages teach that God will actually judge all mankind by their works. Without exception, Rom. 2:6-11 states: “He will render to each one according to his works: to those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immorality, he will give eternal life; but for those who are self-seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, there will be wrath and fury. There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek, but glory and honor and peace for everyone who does good, the Jew first and also the Greek. For God shows no partiality.” The reason this does not teach works salvation is that when we come to God in faith (as a result of his work of regeneration in our hearts–John 1:13 and 1 Jn. 5:1, and his gifts of faith–Acts 3:16, 15:9, 18:27, 1 Pet. 1:21, Phil. 1:29, Eph. 1:19-20, 2 Pet. 1:1 and repentance–Acts 5:31, 11:18, 2 Tim. 2:25) he begins a good work in us (Phil. 1:6) and will be the One to complete it. He will produce good works in us as a testimony of the genuineness of our faith–Eph. 2:10, Phil. 2:13, 1 Cor. 15:10, 1 Thess. 5:23-24, Jude 24, Tit. 2:14.

In other words, true regeneration produces true fruit. This is Jesus’ teaching in Matt. 7:18-19 “A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.” In the parable of the sower, the only soil which produced fruit was the good soil. Even thought the rocky soil produced plants which looked healthier than the fruitful plants, they bore no fruit and withered away. Jesus said this represents those “who receive [the word] with joy…but…have no root: they believe for a while, and in time of testing fall away.” The clear teaching of the parable is that transient faith does not save. Only the faith that bears fruit saves.

In understanding perseverance, it is important to recognize the difference between justification and glorification. Justification is the legal pronouncement of “not guilty” which happens immediately upon our faith and is based on Christ’s substitutionary atonement. This pronouncement is a voice from heaven, so to speak, concerning our hearts. The testimony from earth (our lifestyle) does not unfalteringly reflect this. Sanctification is a slow and gradual process of the out-working of our faith and the living out of our justification. Glorification is the point when we are gloriously tranformed into Christ’s image immediately after our death. At this point salvation is final. Up until then, since we cannot enter heaven’s throneroom and hear the irreversible verdict of “not guilty” applied to us, we must trust in sanctification to prove the genuineness of our faith. The term “salvation” is most often used in Scripture to refer to our glorification and only sparingly used to refer to justification. So when we see the English words “whoever believes will be saved” it usually is teaching that whoever believes will one day ultimately be saved/glorified. The Greek tense used for “believe” most often (99% or more of the time) in such statements is the present tense which directly conveys a continual action. Literally, it is often stated, “the believing one will be saved”. If we walk away from faith and cease believing we prove to not be a “believing one”.

Perseverance is required of believers. It is our duty. But the flip side of this is the teaching that God will preserve His elect (John 10:26-30, 1 Pet. 1:5, etc.). So all of the elect–all the truly regenerate among professing believers–will persevere and it will be by God’s grace. Most reading this post already understand that God will preserve the elect, so I will not labor to prove that assertion. But what follows will conclude this post by providing a defense of my assertion that the Bible requires us (professing believers) to persevere.

The Bible speaks of our need to “examine” ourselves (2 Cor. 13:5) and to diligently “make our calling and election sure” (2 Pet. 1:10). We cannot assume that since we believed in the past or made some profession of faith, we are absolutely and inviolably secure eternally. We must make room for the Scriptural potential that our faith could be insincere or not genuine. Luke 8:13 again, speaks of those who “believe for a while, and in time of testing fall away”. Even Paul leaves it open that he might even still yet become a “castaway” (same Greek word for apostate) in 1 Cor. 9:27.

Heb. 3:12-14 (along with other warning passages in Hebrews) is emphatically clear that we might ultimately fall away, and so thus we need to daily exhort one another to continue in belief. Paul calls this the “good fight of faith” in 1 Tim. 6:12 and exhorts Timothy to “take hold of the eternal life” (6:12) and to “hold faith” (1:19), because some had already “made shipwreck of their faith” (1:20), and some have “abandoned their former faith” (5:12), and others have “swerved from the faith” (6:21). This is why he exhorts Timothy to “Keep a close watch on yourself and on the teaching. Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers.” (4:16) This is why so often Paul and other Scriptural authors do not boldly assure their readers of their personal sharing in Christ, rather they hold out before them their duty to persevere. See all the conditional statements in the following verses: Col. 1:23–“if indeed you continue in the faith, stable and steadfast,…”; 1 Cor. 15:2–“by which [the gospel] you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you–unless you believed in vain”; Heb. 3:6–“and we are his house if indeed we hold fast our confidence and our boasting in our hope”; Heb. 3:14–“we share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original confidence firm to the end”; John 8:31–“if you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples”; Mark 13:13–“the one who endures to the end will be saved”; 2 Tim. 2:12–“if we endure, we will also reign with him”; Rom. 8:13–“if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live”; Gal. 6:9–“in due season we will reap [eternal life (see 6:8)], if we do not give up”; Heb. 12:14–“holiness without which no one will see the Lord”; James 2:26 (with 14)–“faith apart from works is dead” and “can that faith save him?”

Scripture never gives us assurance of salvation based on our profession of faith (in a past time and place), rather it declares the objective reality of Christ’s work and the subjective reality of the Spirit’s work in our lives as the grounds for assurance. (And the stress in 1 John is on our subjective experience of characteristic obedience.) 1 John 2:3 states ” And by this we know that we have come to know him, if we keep his commandments.” 1 John 2:19 also gives us the key to understanding this truth. It helps us to interpret what happened when we see someone who seemed to have genuine faith fall away. It declares, “They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they weent out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us.” In other words, we should not conclude like some Arminians that all professing believers who fall away have in fact lost their salvation. Rather we should conclude that they were only professing but not possessing faith. Paul teaches this same truth when he declares belief could be in vain (1 Cor. 15:2) or could be only temporary (see 1 Thess. 3:5). Jesus also clearly taught both the reality of professors being proven to not possess faith in the scary passage of Matt. 7:21-23, and the need to persevere in Luke 21:34-36 among other places.

To sum up the teaching of perseverance, let us quote 2 passages. 2 Thess. 2:13b “God chose you as the firstfruits to be saved, through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth.” Heb. 6:12b “be…imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises.” Both of these passages teach that ultimate, final salvation (inheriting the promises) come to those who both believe and persevere (are sanctified/have patience).

But should this teaching result in our condemning large segments of evangelicalism and condemning many we know? Are we to judge them as not being true possessors since we may doubt their perseverance? No! Emphatically, no! Remember, justification is a heavenly sentence. We do not know, here on earth, what that sentence is. We can judge based on their fruits, but we also must be aware of the motes and beams in our own eyes. We should judge ourselves first and others much later. We can have confidence and hope in our sovereign God that there are evidences of grace in all who profess salvation. But then again, we know Biblically that this is most likely not the case. So rather than condemn one another, we should seek to edify one another and encourage them to press on, and to continue in belief (Heb. 3:2-14 and Gal. 6:1-9).

Before I close, we must revisit that popular maxim, “once saved, always saved.” If “saved” is viewed as glorification, I do not disagree at all with that statement. Nor would I if “saved” is viewed as justification. But once again, the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and the proof of justification is in your works (James 2). So even with the truth of once justified, always justified in view, we must never assume we have been justified if we have no good works to point to as Spirit-wrought proof.

In conclusion, brothers and sisters, I say with the apostle John “Watch yourselves, so that you may not lose what we have worked for, but may win a full reward.” (2 John 1:8) And remember that although Jude warns us to “Keep yourselves in the love of God, waiting for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ that leads to eternal life” (v. 21) he also assures us “Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy…” (v. 24). So do not lose heart. Trust in God’s great promises, and fight the good fight of faith. Above all, do not presume that you have arrived and are outside the bounds of Scripture’s warnings. Rather, “be all the more diligent to make your calling and election sure, for if you practice these qualities you will never fall.” (2 Pet. 1:10)

For a more succinct treatment of this topic, I refer you to an earlier post where I reproduce an outline by my brother Dave on Heb. 3:2-14. Also, for a Biblical look at how important mutual edification of believers is, see my post on 1 Thessalonians. And for more resources concerning this topic, check out some articles and sermons by John Piper listed here on the issue of future grace, or just read his book referenced above. [The last link above was added 2/13/06.]

For further thoughts on this topic check out a more recent post here.

picture was borrowed from here.

Cessationism and Continuationism: a Debate over Spiritual Gifts

Lately, it has been hard to avoid the cessationist / continuationist debate when perusing the Christian blogosphere. I mentioned it myself in a recent post on a somewhat different topic. But the time has come for me to open up the debate for any interested here on my blog.

Have miraculous gifts, tongues, and prophecy ceased today??

What follows is my bringing together a list of links to interesting articles on the topic. I come from a cessationist background, yet I have much sympathy for the continuationist position in principle (for some brief definitions of terms and a discussion of the debate check out Phil Johnson’s post here.) Today there are quite a few “reformed charismatics” . And they are not your typical TBN variety, either!

Before you continue on to the rest of this article, though, at least reference my recent post explaining the current blog-o-debate over this issue centering on Phil Johnson’s blogs (his now abandoned Pyromaniac, and the new teamblog Pyromaniacs).

  • At the onset let me state that I believe much of this debate centers on assumptions and implications. The cessationist assumes that with the closure of the canon, the function of these miraculous or apostolic-type gifts (throw in prophecy too) is no longer needed. They also assume that the purpose of the gifts is tied up in an apostolic authentication function which has ceased with the John the Beloved’s death. On the flip side, the continuationist assumes the gifts should continue since Scripture does not expressly teach there cessation. (Cessationists’ claims that 1 Cor. 13:8 is such an express teaching seem too simplistic and eisegetical to me.)
  • Now, to the articles…. Phil Johnson points out, in a post entitled “You’re probably a cessationist, too”, that virtually all charismatics agree that the modern use of prophecy (and even the modern exercise of the gift of miracles) is inherently different from the NT exercise of it by the apostles and others. From this he claims continuationists “have, in effect, conceded the entire concessionist argument” .
  • Adrian Warnock points out, though, that virtually all cessationists concede a good bit of the continuationist’s argument by holding to a continued experiential role of the Holy Spirit in the lives of believers.
  • Steve S has a series of articles on this subject which trace the nature of Biblical prophecy and show how the closing of the canon really does not address the question at hand.
  • Ben Wright, of Paleoevangelical, in a series of articles dealing with Fundamental Baptist Fellowship’s position on John Piper (see part 1, part 2, and part 3 of this interesting series) he makes the following interesting observations, “Is there not a difference between recognizing a specific ongoing gift [to specific individuals] of healing or miracles, and merely allowing that God might still choose to perform a miraculous healing or some other sign to validate the gospel?” And he brings the argument home when he applies this point to fundamentalist missionaries describing miraculous workings of God on the foreign field. He says, “These events seem to be similar to what Piper is talking about. The only difference I see is that Piper is advocating that we pray for these signs, but fundamentalists merely testify that they happen.” See the whole post here.
  • Steven Harris has an excellent article dealing with the eschatological function of spiritual gifts. THIS IS DEFINITELY WORTH READING!!
  • And last, but not least, John Piper has a good Scriptural treatment of spiritual gifts here. He does an especially good job dealing with the cessationist use of 2 Cor. 12:11-12 to prove the gifts are “apostolic signs” , and must therefore pass away with the apostles.

Any thoughts or suggestions? Anyone willing to contribute to the debate? For now, I am still reading and thinking prayerfully about this position, although I must be honest in stating that I can see a lot more Scriptural support on the continuationist side of the fence.

(But in closing, let me stress, this issue does not necessarily need to divide believers. The Reformation principle of Sola Scriptura is affirmed by many on both sides. The presence of explicitly false prophecies or unscriptural superstitions, or an unbiblical emphasis on the gift of tongues ”these issues are actually distinct and separate from this issue. They do not necessarily follow from continuationism. Again I point you to Nathan Pitchford’s call to unity here.)

Pyromaniacs, Lone Rangers, and the Bible

Pyromaniacs, these guys are hot!If you have ever checked out the “bobspotted blogs” section of my sidebar, you know that I am a Pyromaniac fan. And if you actually read my lengthy blogroll from yesterday you know that Phil Johnson has decided to manage the Barbarian hordes of violent commentors and insistent visitors by turning his popular blog into a team blog–Pyromaniacs.

The new blog promises to be as attractive, popular, and controversial as the last one. I know, you never really imagined those three adjectives being used together in reference to a blog. But then again, that is what makes Pyromaniac (and now Pyromaniacs) so intriguing.

Aside from continuing Phil Johnson’s reputation, Pyromaniacs is picking up his latest and most controversial subject. For quite a while, Phil has attempted to discuss the evangelical fascination with personal revelations and generally poor hermeneutics (for a brief recap check out this post by Phil). He began by highlighting some of the most egregious of charismatic soothsayers, attempting to get everyone to agree at how heinous (just plain wrong) it is to make specific prophecies in the name of Christ such as those made by Benny Hinn and company. But the cessationist debate kept coming to the forefront of the comments and in this post, Phil explains that he has been practically forced to deal with the cessationist debate.

Now what I want to discuss about this debate is more an offshoot of it–the principle of the sufficiency of Scripture. You may wonder why I call this an offshoot. But in truth, a large number of charismatics/continuationists (for a simple definition of some of these terms check out the box at the top of this post) are reformed and believe strongly in sola Scriptura. Many of these are the commentors plaguing Phil’s blogs of late. Some of the principle “Reformed charismatics” understand spiritual gifts much differently than the more mainstream and typical charismatic you remember from years gone by.

Anyway, the sufficiency of Scripture has been debated in the midst of this controversial blog-o-debate. So I wanted to bring together some good posts on this subject for your (and my) benefit.

  • First, check out James Spurgeon’s treatment of the closing of the canon here and here (over on his main blog, Howling Coyote).
  • Then, go back and check out Phil’s post which birthed the above treatment.
  • Now in from a slightly different but related angle, check out James Spurgeon’s post on Lone Ranger Christians. THIS IS A PHENOMENAL AND VERY GOOD POST, A MUST READ!! [Also check up his clarifying follow up post.]
  • And finally, in a similar vein check out my earlier highlight of an article by Ryan Debarr entitled Just the Bible. And also check out a similar post by Ray on the importance of study in relation to Bible interpretation.

Hebrews 3: Chist–our Apostle & High Priest, and Perseverance

Douglas Wilson has some excellent exegetical comments on Heb. 3:1-6 over on his blog, Blog and Mablog. Below are some excerpts.

The phrase “apostle and high priest” is striking. This is the one place in Scripture where Christ is called an apostle, that is, one who is sent out. A “sent one” has the authority and commission of the one sending. For example, an apostle of a church is one like a missionary or church planter. And apostle of Christ is sent out by Christ and has His authority, as did the Twelve. In this instance, Christ is described as an apostle. He was sent out by God the Father, and represents God to us. At the same time, He is described as a High Priest””that is, as one of us to represent us to God. A priest is chosen from among the people and stands before them to represent them. This phrase “apostle and high priest” therefore means that Christ is the perfect bridge between God and man. As an apostle of God, He represents God perfectly to us, and as our High Priest, He represents us perfectly to God….

We are that house. The Bible is very clear that we are God’s building, God’s house….

Given this, what is necessary? We must hold firm to the end. We see here, stated plainly, the doctrine of perseverance. Whose house we are, if . . . Three classes of men exist. Some are never in the house. They have no connection to the Christian faith at all. Some are in the house, but only temporarily. They are covenantally connected to Christ, and the connection is a real one, but they are not elect. The true sons of the house, however, the elect of God, abide there forever. “And a slave does not abide in the house forever, but a son abides forever. Then if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed” (John 8: 35-36). [Read the whole post.]


∼striving for the unity of the faith for the glory of God∼ Eph. 4:3,13 “¢ Rom. 15:5-7