Category: Books

all about books

So Many Books…So Little Time

~ Bob Hayton ~ 4 Comments

Do you like books? Most of my readers probably do. Regardless of your taste in books, you probably share my problem. You have a bookshelf full of wonderful titles as yet unread.

As much as I love books, I find it hard to stick to my reading plans. I pick one up then lose interest as another catches my eye. I am reading through several as we speak, but I have been making progress. I actually read a book in these last two weeks cover to cover! And then I finished another book I have been working on, and by the end of today will have finished a booklet.

Well, I came across an interesting article on reading. It offers practical tips on pushing through and actually reading the book. But it offers more than that, it encourages “mastering” the book rather than just reading it. The pointers in this article seem like they will help me to take on one book at a time and master it, in a relatively short amount of time. Perhaps this will help me get to all of those editions which are still beckoning to me!

I refer you to this link to read the helpful article entitled “Why Settle for Merely Reading a Book When You Can Master It? How to Read Less More, and Twice as Fast” by Gregory Koukl of Stand to Reason. (I forgot who pointed me to this blog post, sorry.) A brief version of this same article is available here.

∼striving for the unity of the faith for the glory of God∼ Eph. 4:3,13 “¢ Rom. 15:5-7

“Sex, Romance, and the Glory of God” by C.J. Mahaney

~ Bob Hayton ~ 2 Comments

This post finishes my review of Sex, Romance, and the Glory of God, by C.J. Mahaney, which I started here. I highly recommend this book, with but one caveat.

In Mahaney’s eagerness to use Song of Solomon as a Biblical description and instruction of marital intimacy, he falls prey to a wrong approach to interpreting that book. He pits an allegorical interpretation, which sees Christ and his Church as the key players in that song, against a “literal” interpretation, which sees Solomon talking about the joys of marital love. I am aware that some who used an allegorical interpretative scheme in approaching this book did so in such a way as to negate any application of what the song teaches about marital love. However, Mahaney’s approach, which is widespread and pervasive today, errs to an opposite extreme: in applying what the song says directly about marital love it denies any typographical use of the book. I see a third option, one which affirms that the book clearly praises the joys of marital love yet which also recognizes that Solomon’s Song is written within the framework of a redemptive history that the Bible records for us. And just as other Biblical stories foreshadow and describe the redemption Christ accomplished for His people, thereby enhancing our understanding of and appreciation of the Gospel (for instance Gal. 4:24ff.; 1 Cor. 10:4ff.; Rom. 15:4; Luke 24:27, 44-45ff.; and the obvious typography of the Tabernacle and offerings–whole book of Hebrews; see this category of posts for more information), so too the Song of Solomon may rightly be seen to describe the anti-type of which marriage is only a picture. Indeed all marriages are a picture of the abiding covenant love and joyful relationship between Christ and His Bride, the Church (Eph. 5:31-32); and hence it would be proper to see Christ and His Church as ultimately referred to in this beautiful love poem.

Let me not fail to stress here that this really is an absolutely wonderful book on marriage. You need to get it and read it, especially if you are a husband—and even more so if you have already been married for some time. Below I will mention some specific points in the  book which I appreciated, beyond what I have already written. But before I do, I should refer you to a more competent review that what you will see here. Tim Challies has a good review at DiscerningReader.Com; however he may not agree with my caution concerning Mahaney’s interpretational approach to Song of Solomon. Now on to my excerpts and comments on the last four chapters of the book.

More than “The Act”

Most of the book teaches us men how to romance our wives and how to communicate effectively our love to them. Yet it purports to be a book about sex. Mahaney stresses that this is no contradiction: sex is more than just “the act”.

You see, what we express…and how we behave toward our wives in the days and hours before we make love is actually far more important than what we do when the clothes come off…Everything I say to my wife teaches her something about how I value her. Every touch, every kiss on the cheek, every note and gift, every brief phone call—as well as every act of selfish neglect—expresses something about my heart….So, to talk about romantic communication and creativity is not to delay talking about sex. It is to talk about what makes for the best sex.

Communication and sex are inseparable. It’s not as though sex is one thing and communication is something else. Life doesn’t divide into neat little compartments like that, especially when it comes to the oneness of marriage. It’s all one thing. (58-59)

Carefully Composed Words

I found Mahaney’s chapter on “The Language of Romance” to be very interesting. I was challenged to be more intentional in how I communicate with my wife, and to stop neglecting poetry as a means of arousing her love. I used poetry frequently before we were married, I should therefore use it even more, now that we are. Listen to Mahaney on this point:

…[Song of Solomon shows us] a category of communication set apart from the stuff of daily life….It is highly intentional, creative, provocative, erotic language. It’s purpose is to arouse romantic passion—to inflame slowly and intentionally, all the while honoring and delighting one’s spouse….Long before they begin to enjoy one another’s bodies, they excite one another’s minds with tender, creative speech. They model for us what it means to feel sexual passion and to articulate that passion. The language is highly poetic, romantically expressed, and exceptionally creative and imaginative. It is also unmistakably sexual.

The best sex begins with romance, and the best romance begins with the kind of speech we read in the Song of Solomon. It begins with carefully composed words….

Far from scorning carefully composed words, I should accept the lesson of Solomon’s Song and learn how to use them. Poetic language is a gift from God that can help me promote godly romance with my wife!

…How many times in the past week or month have you spoken to your wife in ways that she found to be romantically and perhaps erotically arousing? (60, 69-70)

Does Natural mean Not Spiritual?

Should lovemaking within marriage be considered a fundamentally spiritual activity? I believe the answer is an unqualified yes.

Is there a case to be made from Scripture that lovemaking is any less important to a marriage than praying together, studying the Bible together, or even attending church together? I don’t think so….

…let’s not see sex as merely a permissible part of marriage or something to be tolerated. Sex in marriage is mandatory and something to be celebrated! (See 1 Corinthians 7:35; Ephesians 5:31) Sex was created for marriage, and marriage was created in part for the enjoyment of sex. (74-75)

A Realistic Approach

…I am confident that a consistently God-glorifying approach to marital intimacy can improve any couple’s sex life significantly. But let’s keep in mind that we’re human, with limitations….On the subject of sexual expectations, Douglas Wilson has pointed out that while some meals are steaks, and some are macaroni and cheese, both are enjoyable. That’s wise counsel. So let your expectations be realistic, and enjoy. (87)

The Love Behind the Sex

Mahaney pointed out something about Song of Solomon that I had never considered. He stressed that Song of Solomon, while highly erotic, is a book about marital love. And he draws some important conclusions from that seemingly inconsequential point.

It’s remarkable how Solomon’s language, while obvious in its intent, is never biologically specific in a way that could be considered vulgar or clinical….that fact is itself full of meaning. Although sexual intercourse is certainly an ultimate expression of a married couple’s erotic encounter, it is not the outstanding central feature of this book. What is dominant in the Song is not any particular physical act. The book is not about sexual intercourse. Rather, it is about the remarkable nature of the couple’s overall relationship—in all its romance, yearning, desire, sensuality, passion, and eroticism….they do not desire to be together simply so they can experience sexual gratification. They want to be together because they are in love, albeit a powerful one…. (88-89)

A Word to Wives

I wanted lastly to mention that there is a great “word to wives” section written by C.J’s wife Carolyn. It is for the most part a reproduction of chapter 7 in her book Feminine Appeal. I read that section, too, and was impressed by Carolyn Mahaney’s wisdom. It like the entire book, is not so much a manual on how to make love, as it is an encouragement to have a deep and lasting joyful relationship with your mate which includes a proper valuing and enjoyment of sex.

This book is available for purchase at the following sites: Amazon.com or direct from Crossway.

Loving and Serving Both Wife and Family

~ Bob Hayton ~ 4 Comments

I’m terrible with books. I pick one up and put one down. I start one, two, three and take forever to finish them. I haven’t finished the books showcased  on my sidebar yet, and already have begun others. That is the way I am, and I am trying to get better.

Anyway, I recently picked up the book Sex, Romance, and the Glory of God: What Every Christian Husband Needs to Know by C.J. Mahaney. I was planning on giving it to someone for a wedding gift, and then I started reading it for myself. It is very quick reading and I’m already almost half way done. Since posts around here have been too rare lately, I thought I could post some thoughts about what I’ve been thinking as I have started this book.

About the Book.

Yes, as the title indicates, the book is about sex. And it focuses on Song of Solomon. But I have read 50 pages and still have not come to the sex part. While I would not say sex is not important and good, I was not looking for a sex manual or anything. And this book is certainly not that. It really only contains 2 chapters which deal with that subject. No, this book is more of a theology of marriage which provides just the right backdrop for a look at how Solomon deals with sex.

I haven’t read the whole thing yet, but it looks like one of the best books I have read on the topic. It sets sex in the proper and Biblical context in which God intended it to be so great. And it calls men—Christian men—to love and romance their wife. It calls us to lead in deepening our marriages and strengthening the love we share with our wives.

The Purpose of Marriage.

Mahaney reminded me afresh of the true purpose of marriage. Ephesians 5:31-32 says, “‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church.” So marriage then is intended to be a picture of how Christ relates to his Church. Let me quote Mahaney at this point, since his words are much more adequate than mine:

Please don’t think of this as merely a helpful illustration or an interesting perspective. It’s much more than that. This is the essence of marriage. This is the divine purpose for your marriage….

So we see that there is a purpose in marriage that goes beyond personal fulfillment. Something of the selfless love, care, and sacrifice that Jesus shows toward the Church is supposed to be evident in you as you relate to your wife. Something of the respect, submission, and devotion that the Church shows toward Jesus is supposed to be evident in your wife as she relates to you. That’s the purpose for your marriage. That is why God has given her to you, and you to her. [pp. 23-25; underlined emphasis was italic in original]

Romancing Your Wife.

The part of the book which has been most helpful and most challenging so far has been its call for men to romance their wives. Mahaney encourages us to plan and work at delighting our wife in any number of small yet meaningful ways. He provides practical pointers and suggestions and strongly encourages a weekly date of some kind.

The truth he wants us to remember, if nothing else from this book is this: “In order for romance to deepen, you must touch the heart and mind of your wife before you touch her body.” [emphasis his, page 28]

In this section he provides a must-ask question: “Do you feel more like a mother or a wife?” [pg. 29]

Concerning this point he continues:

There can be a selfish, sinful tendency among husbands to view their wives as a goal that, once achieved, is then taken for granted. That is how a wife with children comes to feel primarily like a mother. And that is why the very idea of asking a question like this can cause many husbands to swallow hard and consider going off to watch a little TV. But please don’t—I want this to be an encouragement to you.

…A variety of legitimate activities may consume huge quantities of your wife’s time….But whatever your situation, if you make it a priority to love and care for your wife as Christ does the Church…God will touch her heart so that, even when surrounded by diapers, dishes, and diseases, she can answer that question with joy: “I feel more like a wife.”

…Motherhood is exceptionally important. It calls for immense sacrifices and deserves great honor. But I can say with full conviction that according to Scripture, motherhood is never to be a wife’s primary role. In fact, I think the most effective mothers are wives who are being continually, biblically romanced by their husbands. [pg. 30]

Loving and Serving Your Family.

Finally, I wanted to quote just a brief story Mahaney shares which was a challenge and encouragement for me to remember that I am to love and serve my wife and family as Christ serves and loves the Church.

When our first two children were still quite young, I realized that my commute home in the evening was functioning as little more than a review of my day. As far as I was concerned, by the time I got in that car, my responsibilities were pretty much over until the next morning. I saw my home as a refuge, a place where the emphasis, for me, was on being served rather than on leading and serving with Christlike love.

In God’s mercy, he showed me the selfish motivation I was bringing home each evening. I saw that my commute could be best utilized as a time of transition, so that I might be prepared to finish the day by loving and serving my family well.

So I made a practice of pulling the car over a few blocks from my home so I could take a couple of minutes to make an effective transition in my soul. There on the side of the road, I meditated on Ephesians 5 as well as on some other passages. I confessed to God my sinful tendency to be selfish and sought to prepare my heart to serve my wife and children when I arrived home. In this way I learned to see my home as the context where I have my greatest privilege and opportunity to serve…. [pp. 50-51]

Read part 2 ofthis review.

Bobspotted Blogroll: September 16, 2006

~ Bob Hayton ~ 1 Comment

Interesting  New Blog

  • I discovered an interesting new blog recently by someone who has come to embrace Calvinism and leave some of the more extreme elements of fundamentalism. Many of his articles are very thought provoking and I am sure you all would be interested in perusing some of them. The blog is aptly titled The Reforming Baptist, and as for who that fellow is, his name is William Dudding.
  • I like to read new blogs chronologically and so I was pleasantly surprised that his second post (from back in August) dealt with the topic my most recent post addresses. William’s post is entitled “Legislated Holiness” and it is a must read. He says a lot with a short post, and he drives his point home: legislation cannot truly produce holiness. (He follows it up later with a good post on legalism.)
  • This post’s title should grab your attention: “Do You Listen to Preaching or Squawking?” The post is even better than the title, it is the best critique of IFBx preaching that I have seen since Regler Joe gave us the universal outline for an IFBx Conference Sermon.
  • The last post of note to mention from William’s blog touches a more somber note. His post entitled “Mis-Representing God” concerns the all too common, tragic results of fundamentalist extremism: kids who grow up in that movement only to walk away from Christianity and faith completely. “If that is Christianity”, they reason, “I want nothing to do with it!”

On the Rise and Fall of Fundamentalism

  • Ryan DeBarr has some very interesting thoughts concerning Fundamentalism being a victim of its own success. He suggests that Fundamentalism helped spawn the conservative resurgence in the SBC as well as the birth of the PCA. And these two movements now are a major factor in fundamentalism’s decline. It is a very worthwhile read.

On Perception, Reality, and a Culture of Fear

  • Bob Bixby has a very thought provoking post on fundamentalism’s tendency to focus too much on perception rather than reality. He is talking mainly about something promoted by leadership whereby they create a culture of fear where everyone is afraid of  how they might be perceived if they are caught doing  various things. It is kind of hard to  talk about the post, you really need to read it. But I will post a few excerpts to whet your appetite.  (HT: Ben Wright)

One pastor chastised a member in his church for allowing a prohibited music at that person’s private function. The music wasn’t bad. It just gave someone the perception of bad music. She had “lost her testimony,” she was told. Several large ministries that I know of, “flagship ministries,” now permit the staff women to wear pants in public as long as no one sees them. [Yeah, yeah, I said that right.] Another major ministry allows its staff members to go to theaters as long as it is outside of a fifty mile radius of the ministry. Hmmm. I wonder what they can do if they go one hundred miles away? Two hundred miles? Tantalizing stuff!

Who are they afraid of? Is there anyone in the real world that will be permanently ill-affected by the sight of a Christian woman in slacks? Is there any normal person that will have his faith ransacked by the mere sight of a staff member going into a cinema. Is there any regular Joe that will fall from the faith by the beat of music? Come on! Who are they really afraid of? The reality is that they are pandering to legalistic, judgmental, Christians who have been bred in a church culture that follows leaders who say “perception is reality” and canonized their misperceptions. And how can you “lose your testimony” to judgmental Christians who are bent on drawing their conclusions from their perceptions when their misperceptions carry within them the power to constrain sincere people? Or why should you care?

…

Leaders actually try to control people based upon their perception even if they misperceive. The problem with believing that perception is reality is that it forces your hand to treat a harmless perception like a grotesque reality. It invites harsh over-reactions. Everybody knows that the male staff member should not have taken the female staff member back to her home without a third party, but you don’t have to can the guy and pin the scarlet letter on him as if he had committed adultery. The perception is dubious, granted, but the reality is probably that the staff members didn’t even think about the negative suggestions their ride home might provoke. Give “˜em a break. Merely consciously admitting the obvious that you don’t know reality for sure will temper how you respond to the perception. But, unfortunately, since perception is reality with these leaders they cultivate a culture of fear and they train their followers to control their leadership by the same means. Now, many leaders today are hamstrung by the cultures they cultivated.

…

Christians need an environment where they know that they will get the benefit of the doubt. They long to be free from the “misperceptions” and accepted on the basis of, and even in spite of, the reality. It is only in an environment like that where they will flourish….[Be sure to read the entire article.]

On Finney and Fame

  • Okay, fame is misleading, but it does go nicely with Finney.    Four links to my post on Finney and the altar call is hardly fame, although one of the links was from Phil Johnson in a Pyromaniacs’ Blogspotting post. (Thanks to David Kjos, Micah Fries, and “seeker” for the other links!)
  • Confession time: If you  have yet to  put two and two together,  you may  be interested  to learn that  Phil’s use of the term “blogspot” is where I came up with the idea for “bobspotted”, as in “Bobspotted Blogrolls” and “Bobspotted Blogs”.
  • I cannot leave this point without mentioning that Micah Fries‘ link is in the context of his own good article on the altar call and Charles Finney. He furnishes us with an interesting quote by Finney on his own use of that method. I encourage you guys to go check out his article, if you were interested in mine.

On A Free Book Offer

  • Can’t  pass up letting you all know about a freebie! The book is entitled The Graham Formula: Why Most Decisions for Christ are Ineffective and it is by Patrick MacIntyre. Here is the deal, the book is free for pastors from now through September 29th. The rest of us can buy it for $7.99 (+ $3.99 S/H even if you qualify for a free book), or download it for $2.99, like I did.
  • The book looks really good. It makes several of the same criticisms I pointed out in my recent post on Finney and the Altar Call. However, the book is actually dedicated to Finney, with the  belief that the altar call itself is not bad, rather  it is Billy Sunday’s innovations which are at fault. The book also praises Billy Graham in ways I had not heard before. But I think that idiosyncracies aside, the book does a good job in making an important point. The methodologies in vogue today are producing hundreds of false conversions. The book is filled with statistics and quotes from others who make his same point. And for that it seems even more valuable. It is worth $2.99 for sure, and if you can get it for free, go for it! Here is the link for the free deal, and here again is the link for ordering the book.

“The Grace and Truth Paradox” by Randy Alcorn

~ Bob Hayton ~ 5 Comments

On my recent vacation, I read an excellent book by Randy Alcorn, The Grace and Truth Paradox. It is based on John’s statement in John 1:14 that Jesus was “full of grace and truth”. Some churches (and Christians) today emphasize grace over truth while others do just the opposite. Christ did neither. He was full of grace and truth.The book is small (92 pages). It is part of Multnomah’s “Small Books, Big Change” series. Yet it has a big message. It is very easy to read, yet some of its principles are potentially life-changing, and merit thoughtful contemplation. To that end, I will finish out this “review” by providing some quotes from the book itself, and let Randy do the talking.

A grace-starved, truth-starved world needs Jesus, full of grace and truth. (p. 14)

Some churches today embrace truth but need a heavy dose of grace. Other churches talk about grace but cry out for a heavy dose of truth. (p.15)

Truth-oriented Christians love studying Scripture and theology. But sometimes they’re quick to judge and slow to forgive. They’re strong on truth, weak on grace.

Grace-oriented Christians love forgiveness and freedom. But sometimes they neglect Bible study and see moral standards as “legalism.” They’re strong on grace, weak on truth.

Countless mistakes in marriage, parenting, ministry, and other relationships are failures to balance grace and truth. Sometimes we neglect both. Often we choose one over the other. (p. 17)

Why should we have to choose between conservatism’s emphasis on truth and liberalism’s emphasis on grace? Why can’t we oppose injustice to minorities and to the unborn? Why can’t we oppose greedy ruination of the environment and anti-industry New Age environmentalism? Why can’t we affirm the biblical right to the ownership of property and emphasize God’s call to voluntarily share wealth with the needy? Why can’t we uphold God’s condemnation of sexual immorality, including homosexual practices, and reach out in love and compassion to those trapped in destructive lifestyles and dying from AIDS?

We cannot do these things if we are first and foremost either liberals or conservatives. We can do these things only if we are first and foremost followers of Christ, who is full of grace and truth. (p. 80-81)

If we minimize grace, the world sees no hope for salvation. If we minimize truth, the world sees no need for salvation. To show the world Jesus, we must offer unabridged grace and truth, emphasizing both, apologizing for neither. The Colossian church “understood God’s grace in all its truth” (Colossians 1:6)

Truth is quick to post warning signs and guardrails at the top of the cliff. Yet it fails to empower people to drive safely–and neglects to help them when they crash.

Grace is quick to post ambulances and paramedics at the bottom of the cliff. But without truth, it fails to post warning signs and build guardrails. In so doing, it encourages the very self-destruction it attempts to heal. (p. 87-88)

Grace and truth are both necessary. Neither is sufficient….We who are truth-oriented need to go out of our way to affirm grace. We who are grace-oriented need to go out of our way to affirm truth. “Hate the sin, but love the sinner.” No one did either like Jesus. Truth hates sin. Grace loves sinners. Those full of grace and truth do both. (p. 88)

In Jesus, “mercy and truth have met together” (Psalm 85:10, NKJV). Grace and truth met face to face on the Cross. (p. 92)

This book is available for purchase at the following sites: Amazon.com or direct from Waterbrook Multnomah.