Striving for the Unity of the Faith for the Glory of God ~ Eph. 4:3,13; Rom. 15:5-7

fundyreformed on January 9th, 2010

Today it is common to speak of four hundred thousand variants to the Greek New Testament. Agnostic scholars like Bart Ehrman, like to stoke the fires of public mistrust in the Bible by pointing out the “textual corruption” of the New Testament. Closer to home, “King James Version-Only” advocates like to emphasize the [...]

Continue reading about A.T. Robertson on Textual Variants

fundyreformed on August 27th, 2009

You may want to check out my team KJV Only? blog.  I’m continuing a series I started on this blog, called Testing the Textus Receptus.  Today’s post centers on Rev. 16:5 one of the “certainly erroneous” passages in the KJV, to use E.F. Hills’ (a KJV defender himself) term.
Come on over and check out the [...]

Continue reading about New on the KJV Only Debate Blog…

fundyreformed on June 11th, 2009

Author: Philip W. Comfort
Format: Hardcover
Page Count: 899
Publisher: Tyndale House
Publication Date: 2008
ISBN: 9781414310343
Rating: 5 of 5 stars
My thanks go out to Christy Wong at Tyndale House Publishers for supplying me with a review copy of Philip Comfort’s New Testament Text and Translation Commentary.
I have always been intrigued by textual criticism and the study of how we [...]

Continue reading about New Testament Text and Translation Commentary by Philip Comfort

fundyreformed on February 14th, 2009

In Testing the Textus Receptus posts, I test the claims of Textus Receptus (TR) Onlyism.  This is a moderate form of King James Onlyism focusing on the Greek (& Hebrew) basis for the King James Version.
As I mentioned earlier, Luke 2:22 is one of three passages that James White (author of The King James Only [...]

Continue reading about Testing the Textus Receptus: Luke 2:22

fundyreformed on February 12th, 2009

Recently, James White debated Bart Ehrman, a former evangelical textual scholar turned agnostic on the reliability of the New Testament.  I am not necessarily a White fan, and I am not going to speculate as to who really won the debate.  What interests me has to do with White’s fielding some criticism from proponents of [...]

Continue reading about Testing the Textus Receptus: Introduction