“Jesus 365, A Devotional” compiled by Ed Stewart

~ Bob Hayton

In the second century after Christ, the Diatessaron was a popular Christian book which took the four Gospels and combined them into one single story of Christ. This year, I’ve been reading a fascinating devotional book based on the same principle, Jesus 365, A Devotional: Experiencing the Four Gospels as One Single Story compiled by Ed Stewart (Harvest House). If you’ve been a Christian long enough, you’ve probably seen a Harmony of the Gospels. This book, takes that idea of a harmony to another level. The four Gospel accounts are carefully blended into one continuous narrative.

The book is a daily devotional, with 365 separate readings, each with a memorable or devotional quote at the bottom of the page. Each day’s reading also includes the Biblical references which are used for that selection. Sprinkled throughout the book are occasional explanations of the editorial decisions made regarding the chronology of this harmony as well as brief descriptions of Jewish feasts, tax collectors and other details about the life and times of Jesus.

The book advocates a unique position on the length of Christ’s ministry, opting for a four year ministry rather than the traditional three year view. A detailed defense of a four year ministry is included in the book.

Each day’s reading is given a number rather than a date. This makes it easy to just read through as a story rather than only one page a day, like a typical devotional. When reading more than a page at the time, I find myself skipping the devotional thoughts to pay attention more to the Biblical accounts of Christ.

This book certainly shouldn’t replace a careful reading of each of the four Gospels. God gave us four accounts of Christ, not one. However, there is still much devotional benefit in reading the full story together in one book. The early Christians prized their Diatessaron, and you will prize this book too. It may open your eyes to a clearer view of Jesus’ glory.

Disclaimer: this book was provided by the publisher for review. The reviewer was under no obligation to provide a positive review.

This book is still available for purchase at Amazon.com.

4 thoughts on ““Jesus 365, A Devotional” compiled by Ed Stewart”

  1. I read a book similar to this in my masters class on the Life of Christ at PCC. The authors last name was Cheney, and he advocated a four year ministry also. He titled his book “The Life of Christ in Stereo.”

  2. This is basically the same book. Let me quote from the book’s explanation:

    The first edition of Cheney and Ellisen’s blended Gospels was published by Western Seminary in 1969 under the title The Life of Christ in Stereo. A subsequent edition, entitled The Greatest Story, was published by Multnomah Books in 1994. Dr. Ellisen skillfully shepherded the book through revisions over the years. And Dr. Earl Radmacher, now President of Grace Seminary of the Northwest in Salem, Oregon, remained a staunch advocate for the work through its various stages. These first two editions of the book are now out of print.

    But one man was not content to allow Cheney and Ellisen’s excellent translation to disappear. Robert A. Meltebeke, DMin, an acquaintance of Ellisen and Radmacher, acquired the rights to the blended translation. Enlisting Ellisen’s help, Meltebeke published another edition of the work entitled Jesus Christ, The Greatest life (Paradise Publishing, 1999), including a leader’s guide and study guide. Shortly after completing his work on this edition, Dr. Ellisen passed away. Jesus Christ, The Greatest Life is also available in electronic form through Logos Bible Software.

    Jesus 365 is a daily reading version of Cheney and Ellisen’s translation of the Gospels, prepared by Ed Stewart and published with the cooperation and assistance of Dr. Robert Meltebeke.

    The book also includes a story of Johnston M. Cheney’s history in preparing the original form of the book and mentions him as the primary man responsible.

    Thanks for bringing the earlier work up.

  3. Personally, I’m not yet convinced of the four year theory because it seems to disrupt the chronology of the Gospels too much. I haven’t studied it out too closely yet.

Comments are closed.