<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MacArthur &amp; Company on KJV Onlyism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fundamentallyreformed.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fundamentallyreformed.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/</link>
	<description>Reforming Fundamentalism (IFB) through Reformed Theology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:29:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fundyreformed</title>
		<link>http://www.fundamentallyreformed.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/comment-page-1/#comment-6496</link>
		<dc:creator>fundyreformed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fundyreformed.wordpress.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/#comment-6496</guid>
		<description>Brother Pavlos,

Thanks for linking to your article.  You will notice I used it for a post &lt;a href=&quot;http://fundyreformed.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/honest-kjv-advocate/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  It is refreshing to see your honesty, even as you uphold the KJV but do not claim for it perfection.

Blessings to you and yours,

Bob Hayton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brother Pavlos,</p>
<p>Thanks for linking to your article.  You will notice I used it for a post <a href="http://fundyreformed.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/honest-kjv-advocate/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  It is refreshing to see your honesty, even as you uphold the KJV but do not claim for it perfection.</p>
<p>Blessings to you and yours,</p>
<p>Bob Hayton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavlos Karageorgi</title>
		<link>http://www.fundamentallyreformed.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/comment-page-1/#comment-6497</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavlos Karageorgi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fundyreformed.wordpress.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/#comment-6497</guid>
		<description>Dear Brethren,

I have written an article called - Dangers of “KJV Onlyism” or KJV Perfectionism - which is found on http://www.bethelwimbledon.com/

Christian Greetings,

Pavlos K.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Brethren,</p>
<p>I have written an article called &#8211; Dangers of “KJV Onlyism” or KJV Perfectionism &#8211; which is found on <a href="http://www.bethelwimbledon.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bethelwimbledon.com/</a></p>
<p>Christian Greetings,</p>
<p>Pavlos K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fundyreformed</title>
		<link>http://www.fundamentallyreformed.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/comment-page-1/#comment-6494</link>
		<dc:creator>fundyreformed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fundyreformed.wordpress.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/#comment-6494</guid>
		<description>Charles,

Various versions might be used, but that doesn&#039;t mean a church won&#039;t have one specific one that they use.  Our church uses the ESV and that is our pew Bible.  I know of people who have brought various other versions, but everything done publically is out of the ESV.  Our readings are projected on the screen, when we read passages of Scripture, so we are all on the same page.

I understand your point, though.  And I understand you are fine with the NASV.

Just explaining it for other people in case they wonder.

God bless you in Christ,

Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p>
<p>Various versions might be used, but that doesn&#8217;t mean a church won&#8217;t have one specific one that they use.  Our church uses the ESV and that is our pew Bible.  I know of people who have brought various other versions, but everything done publically is out of the ESV.  Our readings are projected on the screen, when we read passages of Scripture, so we are all on the same page.</p>
<p>I understand your point, though.  And I understand you are fine with the NASV.</p>
<p>Just explaining it for other people in case they wonder.</p>
<p>God bless you in Christ,</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Whisnant</title>
		<link>http://www.fundamentallyreformed.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/comment-page-1/#comment-6495</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Whisnant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fundyreformed.wordpress.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/#comment-6495</guid>
		<description>The preacher says &quot;Please turn to Galatians 4 this morning and let us read verses 1 thru 10.&quot;

He starts reading the text out of the NASV, which is okay, and the members turn in their bible to a number of Versions. There could be up to a dozen different bibles.

I am glad the preacher does not say, &quot;Yet us read out loud these verse.&quot;

Charles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The preacher says &#8220;Please turn to Galatians 4 this morning and let us read verses 1 thru 10.&#8221;</p>
<p>He starts reading the text out of the NASV, which is okay, and the members turn in their bible to a number of Versions. There could be up to a dozen different bibles.</p>
<p>I am glad the preacher does not say, &#8220;Yet us read out loud these verse.&#8221;</p>
<p>Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fundyreformed</title>
		<link>http://www.fundamentallyreformed.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/comment-page-1/#comment-6493</link>
		<dc:creator>fundyreformed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fundyreformed.wordpress.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/#comment-6493</guid>
		<description>All three of these books are good.  I would recommend &quot;One Bible Only? Examining the Exclusive Claims of KJV Onlyism&quot; the best.

Thanks for the comments, guys.

Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All three of these books are good.  I would recommend &#8220;One Bible Only? Examining the Exclusive Claims of KJV Onlyism&#8221; the best.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments, guys.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Lawton</title>
		<link>http://www.fundamentallyreformed.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/comment-page-1/#comment-6492</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Lawton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fundyreformed.wordpress.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/#comment-6492</guid>
		<description>Also, there have been two other major works written that expose the errors/heresies of KJV-onlyism. One is James White&#039;s &quot;The KJV-only Controversy&quot; and the other is Central Baptist Theological Seminary&#039;s (faculty) &quot;One Bible?&quot;. They go much deeper into the arguments made by KJV-onlyists. Considering that CBTS is an independent Baptist seminary, their book presents the view from &#039;inside&#039; the modern fundamentalist movement, where KJV-onlyism has dominated many churches that are independent and fundamentalist.

MacArthur &amp; company have put together a very cursory and brief segment with arguments from KJV/TR-onlyists and a rebuttal. I thought it was well done, and the blog interaction was somewhat interesting. It&#039;s obvious that a few KJV-onlyists chose to read and interact as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, there have been two other major works written that expose the errors/heresies of KJV-onlyism. One is James White&#8217;s &#8220;The KJV-only Controversy&#8221; and the other is Central Baptist Theological Seminary&#8217;s (faculty) &#8220;One Bible?&#8221;. They go much deeper into the arguments made by KJV-onlyists. Considering that CBTS is an independent Baptist seminary, their book presents the view from &#8216;inside&#8217; the modern fundamentalist movement, where KJV-onlyism has dominated many churches that are independent and fundamentalist.</p>
<p>MacArthur &amp; company have put together a very cursory and brief segment with arguments from KJV/TR-onlyists and a rebuttal. I thought it was well done, and the blog interaction was somewhat interesting. It&#8217;s obvious that a few KJV-onlyists chose to read and interact as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excogitatingengineer</title>
		<link>http://www.fundamentallyreformed.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/comment-page-1/#comment-6491</link>
		<dc:creator>excogitatingengineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fundyreformed.wordpress.com/2007/01/23/macarthur-company-on-kjv-onlyism/#comment-6491</guid>
		<description>D.A. Carson has written a good book on the issue called The King James Version Debate: A Plea for Realism.  I recommend it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D.A. Carson has written a good book on the issue called The King James Version Debate: A Plea for Realism.  I recommend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
